Electronic edition published by Cultural Heritage Langauge Technologies (with permission from Charles Scribners and Sons) and funded by the National Science Foundation International Digital Libraries Program. This text has been proofread to a low degree of accuracy. It was converted to electronic form using data entry.
HUTTON, JAMES (b. Edinburgh, Scotland, 3 June
1726; d. Edinburgh, 26 March 1797), geology, agriculture,
physical sciences, philosophy.
The Theory of the Earth.
(1795). In this edition the 1788 theory is restated with
no essential change in the first chapter of volume I.
The remainder of the two volumes deals principally
with the supporting proofs and illustrations. Only two
of the four parts promised on the title page were
published in 1795. Hutton left an unfinished manuscript
containing six chapters totaling 267 pages, evidently
intended for inclusion in an additional volume
of the Theory. These chapters, published as volume
III in 1899, are of considerable interest, for they contain
accounts of several of his later geological journeys.
A study of the three volumes reveals the remarkable
extent of Hutton's geological knowledge,
the thoroughness of his investigations, and the acuteness
of his observations.
The methods Hutton had employed in forming his
theory were essentially the same as those employed
by modern field geologists. He examined many different
types of rocks, paying attention to their structural
relations one to another; and he considered in
detail the mineralogical and chemical composition of
individual rocks. He also studied intensively the
physical processes now operating on the earth's surface.
In addition he examined British, European, and
American literature to find support for his conclusions.
The method he employed in formulating his theory
was, as he claimed, based on the principles of natural
philosophy. Some of his conclusions can be described
as speculative, and others were based on misinterpreted
evidence, but these elements in the theory
do not destroy its validity as a whole. It could be
argued that Hutton's theory incorporated ideas that
he had gained from other authors. This question is
difficult to answer, for although he had read extensively,
he seldom if ever quotes the work of another
author in a manner that suggests he had made use
of his ideas. More often, references are made either
to correct a particular author, or to confirm Hutton's
own conclusions. His originality lies in the use he
made of facts and ideas, not in their sources.
The most important advance in geological science
embodied in Hutton's theory was his demonstration
that the process of sedimentation is cyclical in operation,
a principle now accepted as axiomatic. Hutton's
cycle involved the gradual degradation of the land
surface by erosion; the transport of eroded matter to
the sea, there to be deposited as sediments; and the
consolidation of the sediments on the sea bottom,
followed by their elevation to form new land surfaces,
which in turn were subject to erosion. Hutton showed
that this cyclic process must have been repeated an
indeterminate number of times in the past, and because
he could find no evidence to suggest that it
might cease, he assumed that it would continue
indefinitely.
In constructing his theory Hutton had used as a
working hypothesis the assumption, based on his own
observations, that the geological evidence provided
by surface rocks provided both a key to the past and
an indication of the probable future course of events.
His theory formulated for the first time the general
principle that some fifty years later came to be known
as uniformitarianism.
In the fields of physical geology and geomorphology
Hutton's views were strikingly modern. His
knowledge of the processes of erosion and the agents
that activate these processes, particularly river action,
was thorough. His imaginative reasoning led to one
remarkable conclusion about the possible action of
glaciers in Switzerland. He had read in H. B. de
Saussure's Voyages dans les Alpes (Neuchâtel, 1779)
a description of scattered boulders of granite, often
of immense size, which rested on limestone in the
Saleve area, and had obviously been transported
there from a distant source. De Saussure believed
that their presence could not be accounted for by
river action, and he suggested that they had been
brought there by a vast debacle or general flood.
Although he had not visited Switzerland, Hutton
proposed a solution much nearer the truth. He suggested
that in the past, when the height of the Alps
had been very much greater, “immense valleys of ice
sliding down in all directions towards the lower country,
and carrying large blocks of granite to a great
distance” (Theory, II [1795], 218), had transported
these erratic blocks; and that in the course of time
the upper parts of the mountains that had carried
these glaciers had been removed by erosion. The true
explanation, that the distribution of erratics of this
sort had been effected by great ice sheets covering
much of Europe, was not put forward until some forty
years later.
Hutton also made contributions, second only in
importance to his main theory, in the field of igneous
geology. He was much impressed by the worldwide
distribution of volcanic activity, and by the new discoveries
that in some areas there occurred lavas that
must have been erupted in prehistoric times. He
made a detailed study of the numerous outcrops of
igneous rocks in or near Edinburgh (some almost on
his own doorstep), and of others in various parts of
Scotland. He distinguished two types, lavas and intrusions,
including among the latter both flat sheets
and dykes, and he established for the first time the
existence of a new class of rocks, the intrusive igneous
rocks. He concluded that all igneous rocks originated
in what he called the “mineral region,” a subcrustal
zone of undefined depth in which heat of sufficient
intensity to melt rocks prevailed.
Hutton also established the igneous origin of granite,