Electronic edition published by Cultural Heritage Langauge Technologies (with permission from Charles Scribners and Sons) and funded by the National Science Foundation International Digital Libraries Program. This text has been proofread to a low degree of accuracy. It was converted to electronic form using data entry.
HUTTON, JAMES (b. Edinburgh, Scotland, 3 June
1726; d. Edinburgh, 26 March 1797), geology, agriculture,
physical sciences, philosophy.
The Theory of the Earth.
part of the original crust of the earth, but were
formed by a “second cause” and had originally been
deposited at the bottom of the ocean. This reasoning,
he stated, implies that while the present land was
forming there must have existed a former land on
which organic life existed, that this former land had
been subjected to processes of erosion similar to those
operating today, and that the sea was then inhabited
by marine animals. He then concluded that because
the greater part of the present land had been produced
in this way, two further processes had been
necessary to convert it into a permanent body resistant
to the operations of water: the consolidation of
the loose incoherent matter at the sea bottom, and
the elevation of the consolidated matter to the position
it now occupies.
Hutton then considered two possible methods of
consolidation. The first, deposition from solution, he
rejected because the materials of which ordinary sediments
are composed are, with few exceptions, insoluble
in water. He adopted the alternative, fusion
of the sediments by the great heat which he believed
to exist beneath the lower regions of the earth's crust.
Heat, he claimed, was capable of fusing all the substances
found in different types of sediment.
He also concluded that the extreme heat that fused
the sediments must be capable of “producing an
expansive force, sufficient for elevating the land from
the bottom of the ocean to the place it now occupies.”
He supported this conclusion by stating that the
strata formerly deposited in regular succession at the
bottom of the ocean are now often found broken,
folded, and contorted, a condition to be expected as
a result of the violently expansive action of subterraneous
heat.
Hutton then discussed the direct evidence of the
action of heat, which he had found in the rocks themselves.
He mentioned mineral veins containing matter
foreign to the strata they traverse, the widespread
occurrence of volcanoes, and the occurrence of what
he called “subterraneous lavas.” (The examples
quoted here, and in the fuller version of the theory,
indicate clearly that he was referring to what are now
known as igneous intrusions.)
Hutton next claimed that his theory could be extended
to all parts of the world, a generalization that
was by then justified because similar rocks occur in
other countries. He also claimed that the theory,
based on rational deductions from observed facts,
was not “visionary.”
Finally, Hutton discussed one of the principal objects
of his inquiry, the length of time the earth had
existed as a habitable world, that is, in effect, the
question of geological time. He rejected as humanly
impracticable the possibility of estimating geological
time by measuring the rate at which erosion is wearing
down the land. Hence he concluded
... That it had required an indefinite space of time
to have produced the land which now appears; ... That
an equal space had been employed upon the construction
of that former land from whence the materials
of the present came; ... That there is presently laying
at the bottom of the ocean the foundation of a future
land, which is to appear after an indefinite space of time.
... so that, with respect to human observation, this
world has neither a beginning nor an end [pp. 27-28].
Hutton was not prepared to be more definite than
the facts allowed.
It was also in the Abstract that Hutton disclosed
for the first time his philosophic belief that there
exists in nature evidence of wisdom and design. He
believed that the natural processes operating on and
within the earth's crust had been so contrived as to
provide for the indefinite continuance of the earth
as a habitable world, providing means for the continuing
existence of living beings, and that his theory
provided support for this conclusion. The final paragraph
of the Abstract includes the following statement:
“Thus, either in supposing Nature wise and
good, an argument is formed in confirmation of the
theory, or, in supposing the theory to be just, an
argument may be established for wisdom and benevolence
to be perceived in nature.” Hutton's theory
ran counter to the belief then widely held that the
present world was created by a divine being, fully
populated by animal and plant life, at a time that
could be measured by human records.
Hutton makes few references in the Abstract to the
evidence on which he bases his theory. This is discussed
in detail in his 1788 paper. Here, in discussing
geological time, the conclusion he draws from fossils
is of particular interest. He states:
Time ... is to nature endless and as nothing.... The
Mosaic history places this beginning of man at no great
distance; and there has not been found, in natural
history, any document by which a high antiquity might
be attributed to the human race. But this is not the case
with regard to the inferior species of animals.... We
find in natural history monuments [that is, fossils] which
prove that those animals had long existed; and we thus
procure a measure for the computation of a period of
time extremely remote, though far from being precisely
ascertained [pp. 215, 217].
From 1785 onward Hutton continued to collect
new information to support his theory, which he
published later in a two-volume work, Theory of
the Earth: With Proofs and Illustrations; in Four Parts