Electronic edition published by Cultural Heritage Langauge Technologies (with permission from Charles Scribners and Sons) and funded by the National Science Foundation International Digital Libraries Program. This text has been proofread to a low degree of accuracy. It was converted to electronic form using data entry.
SEDGWICK, ADAM (b. Dent, Yorkshire, England,
22 March 1785; d. Cambridge, England, 27
January 1873), geology.
skill as a field geologist in the first clear analysis of
the effects of diagenesis and low-grade metamorphism.
In particular, his exposition of the distinction
between stratification, jointing, and slaty
cleavage provided the crucial technical key for the
interpretation of the structure of regions with complex
folding.
This had already enabled him, as early as 1832,
to discover the essential structure and succession
of the ancient rocks of North Wales (on his first
expedition there, in 1831, he gave Charles Darwin
his first training as a field geologist). In the same
years Murchison was studying apparently younger
“Transition” strata in the Welsh Borderland. During
their first and only joint study (1834) of the relation
between their two areas, Murchison assured
Sedgwick that his strata (later termed “Silurian”)
lay wholly above Sedgwick's “Cambrian” (so
named in 1835), although there was clear -- and not
unexpected -- faunal similarity between Murchison's
Lower Silurian strata and Sedgwick's Upper
Cambrian Bala series.
Their collaboration continued fruitfully in their
solution of the anomalous problem of the slaty
rocks of Devonshire, where De La Beche's discovery
of Carboniferous plants in rocks of ancient
appearance had seemed for a time to threaten the
validity of both Murchison's and Sedgwick's stratigraphy.
They worked closely in discovering first
that the anomalous fossils had come from a syncline
of slaty rocks of Carboniferous age, and then
that the older rocks in the region were not Silurian
or Cambrian but the lateral equivalents of the Old
Red Sandstone, which they termed “Devonian.”
This interpretation was confirmed by a joint expedition
to the Continent in 1839.
Sedgwick then turned his attention back to the
problem of the Cambrian strata in Wales, as part of
a larger program for a synoptic work (never completed)
on all the Paleozoic strata of Britain. Although
he could not point to a Cambrian fauna as
distinctive as Murchison's Silurian fauna, he rightly
emphasized that the vast thickness of the
Cambrian strata and the apparent beginning of the
fossil record within them justified their status as a
“system” of comparable importance. Indeed, he
underlined their theoretical significance by including
them with the Silurian in a broader category of
“Protozoic.” He was therefore disconcerted and
eventually exasperated when Murchison claimed
that the upper (and fossiliferous) part of his
Cambrian was nothing other than Murchison's
Lower Silurian. Murchison gradually extended this
claim until he had annexed virtually the whole of
the Cambrian and reduced it to a synonym of
Lower Silurian.
Sedgwick later was angered by what he regarded
as editorial tampering with a crucial paper on the
subject submitted to the Geological Society. His
stratigraphical nomenclature was altered, apparently
in the interests of editorial uniformity, and possibly
in innocence of the massive theoretical and
personal implications. Reacting with characteristic
vehemence, he later broke off all dealings with the
Society.
Only gradually did Sedgwick detect the root
cause of the controversy. Murchison earlier had
misinterpreted the order of succession of his
Lower Silurian strata in their type area, so that
they were not in fact younger than Sedgwick's
Upper Cambrian Bala series, but of the same age.
Even more seriously, Sedgwick found in 1854 that
Murchison had confused some Upper Silurian
strata (May Hill sandstone) with these much
earlier Lower Silurian strata (Caradoc series), thus
giving the Silurian faunas a spurious uniformity
down into Sedgwick's Upper Cambrian.
But Murchison naturally was reluctant to admit
these errors, and his position as head of the Geological
Survey (from 1855) allowed him to retain
his interpretation in all the Survey's official publications.
What had begun as a controversy with
important implications for the understanding of the
earliest part of the fossil record gradually degenerated
into a priority dispute between two equally
obstinate old men. The conflict was not settled until
much later, when the discovery of earlier faunas
in Wales rehabilitated the term Cambrian for what
had been Sedgwick's Lower Cambrian; and an
“Ordovician” system was proposed irenically for
the disputed strata (that is, Sedgwick's “Upper
Cambrian” and Murchison's “Lower Silurian”)
between the newly restricted Cambrian and Silurian
systems.
The Geological Society acknowledged the outstanding
value of Sedgwick's work in 1850 (before
he was estranged from it) by awarding him their
highest honor, the Wollaston Medal; and in 1863
the Royal Society, to which he had been elected in
1830, awarded him the Copley Medal.
Sedgwick was seventy-four when Darwin's Origin
of Species was published, but his rejection of
his pupil's evolutionary theory was not simply a
consequence of old age. Thirty years earlier, while
welcoming naturalistic explanations for geological
events (including those responsible for “diluvial”
deposits), he had felt that no purely natural mechanism
could ever account for the origin of new organic