Electronic edition published by Cultural Heritage Langauge Technologies (with permission from Charles Scribners and Sons) and funded by the National Science Foundation International Digital Libraries Program. This text has been proofread to a low degree of accuracy. It was converted to electronic form using data entry.
BRUNO, GIORDANO (b. Nola, Italy, 1548; d. Rome,
Italy, 17 February 1600), philosophy.
and timidly, in fear of the Church's embargo on
magic.
The extreme boldness and fearlessness that characterized
Giordano Bruno are nowhere more apparent
than in his choice of a religion. Discarding the belief
in Hermes as a Gentile prophet, which sanctified the
Hermetic writings for pious Christian Neoplatonists,
Bruno accepted the pseudo-Egyptian religion described
in the Hermetic texts as the true religion; he
interpreted the lament in the Asclepius over the decay
of Egypt and her magical worship as a lament for
the true Egyptian religion, which had been suppressed
by Christianity, although various signs and portents
were announcing its return.
Among these signs was the heliocentricity announced
by Copernicus—and it must be confessed that
Copernicus himself did something to encourage such
an interpretation of his discovery when, at a crucial
point in his work, just after the diagram showing the
new sun-centered system, he referred to Hermes
Trismegistus on the sun as a visible god (a quotation
from the Asclepius). In his defense of Copernicanism
against the Aristotelians of Oxford, Bruno presented
Copernicus as “only a mathematician” who had not
understood the true inwardness of his discovery as he,
Bruno, understood it—as portending a return to
magical insight into living nature. In support of the
movement of the earth, Bruno quoted a passage from
one of the treatises of the Corpus Hermeticum, which
states that the earth moves because it is alive.
The magical animism that permeates Bruno's philosophy
of nature, his vision of the living earth moving
round the sun, of an infinite universe of innumerable
worlds moving like great animals in space, is inseparably
connected with his pseudo-Egyptian religion. It
is universal animism which makes possible the activities
of the magus and justifies the techniques by
which he attempts to operate on nature. Bruno aspired
to become such a magus, using the techniques
described in the De occulta philosophia of Henry
Cornelius Agrippa von Nettesheim, a work that was
itself the product of the Hermetic core within Renaissance
Neoplatonism.
It is one of the most extraordinary features of
Bruno's outlook that he seems to have believed that
his religion could somehow be incorporated within
a Catholic framework in the coming new dispensation.
He never lost his respect for Thomas Aquinas,
and his preaching of his new religion retained traces
of Dominican preacher's training. Although Christ
was for him a benevolent magus, as were Thomas
Aquinas, Paracelsus, Ramón Lull, and Giordano
Bruno himself, he proclaimed in the Spaccio della
bestia trionfante that Christ was to remain in heaven
as an example of a good life.
While still in the convent in Naples, he fell under
suspicion of heresy and proceedings were instituted
against him. The suspicion against him seems to have
been of Arian tendencies; possibly his full “Egyptian”
program was not yet developed. To avoid the process
against him he left Naples in 1576. He went first to
Rome, where he fell into new difficulties, from which
he escaped by abandoning the Dominican habit and
fleeing from Italy. Now began his long odyssey
through France, England, Germany. He went first to
Geneva, where he soon got into trouble and acquired
a strong dislike of Calvinism.
From about 1579 to 1581 he was in Toulouse, where
he lectured in the university on, among other things,
the Sphere of Sacrobosco. From Toulouse he went
to Paris; here his public lectures attracted the attention
of King Henry III. His first published work, the
De umbris idearum (Paris, 1582), is dedicated to Henry.
It is an example of his transformation of the art of
memory into a deeply magical art, and its title is taken
from that of a magical book mentioned in the necromantic
commentary on the Sphere of Sacrobosco by
Cecco d'Ascoli, an author whom Bruno greatly admired.
Bruno thus came before the world in his first
Parisian period as a magician teaching some extremely
abstruse art of memory that apparently
gained the interest and approval of the king of
France, who gave him letters of recommendation to
the French ambassador in England. This is the first
indication of some mysterious political, or politico-religious,
undercurrent in Bruno's activities and
movements.
Bruno crossed the Channel to England early in
1583; the royal letters of recommendation had the
desired effect, for the French ambassador, Michel de
Mauvissière, received him into the French embassy,
where during the two years of his stay in England
he lived as a “gentleman” attached to the embassy.
He states that he often accompanied the ambassador
to court and saw Queen Elizabeth, whom he addresses
as “divine” in his works, an epithet that he had to
try to explain away to the Inquisitors. The ambassadorial
protection enabled Bruno to publish his
extremely provocative works, in which he criticized
Reformation Oxford as inferior in philosophical learning
to the Oxford of the Middle Ages and attacked
the whole social order of Elizabethan England for
having destroyed, without adequately replacing, the
institutions of Catholic times. His books were published
clandestinely, with false imprints, by John
Charlewood. As was to be expected, they aroused
tumults against the bold ex-friar that were sometimes
so violent that he dared not go outside the embassy.
Bruno opened his campaign in England with one
of his obscure works on the magic art of memory,