Electronic edition published by Cultural Heritage Langauge Technologies (with permission from Charles Scribners and Sons) and funded by the National Science Foundation International Digital Libraries Program. This text has been proofread to a low degree of accuracy. It was converted to electronic form using data entry.
NEWTON, ISAAC (b. Woolsthorpe, England,
25 December 1642; d. London, England, 20 March
1727), mathematics, dynamics, celestial mechanics,
astronomy, optics, natural philosophy.
Book III, “The System of the World.”
densities of the planets (the numerical calculations in
this proposition were much altered for the second
edition). In proposition 9, Newton estimated the force
of gravity within a planet and, in proposition 10,
demonstrated the long-term stability of the solar
system. A general “Hypothesis I” (in the second and
third editions; “Hypothesis IV” in the first) holds the
“centre of the system of the world” to be
“immovable,” which center is given as the center of
gravity of the solar system in proposition 11; the sun
is in constant motion, but never “recedes” far from
that center of gravity (proposition 12).
It is often asserted that Newton attained his
results by neglecting the interplanetary attractions,
and dealing exclusively with the mutual gravitational
attractions of the planets and our sun. But this is
not the case, since the most fully explored example
of perturbation in the Principia is indeed that of the
sun-earth-moon system. Thus Newton determined
(proposition 25) the “forces with which the
sun disturbs the motions of the moon,” and
(proposition 26) the action of those forces in producing
an inequality (“horary increment”) of the area
described by the moon (although “in a circular orbit”).
The stated intention of proposition 29 is to “find
the variation of the moon,” the inequality thus being
sought being due “partly to the elliptic figure of the
Moon's orbit, partly to the inequality of the
moments of the area which the Moon by a radius
drawn to the Earth describes.” (Newton dealt with
this topic more fully in the second edition.) Then
Newton studied the “horary motion of the nodes of
the moon,” first (proposition 30) “in a circular orbit,”
and then (proposition 31) “in an elliptic orbit.” In
proposition 32, he found “the mean motion of the
nodes,” and, in proposition 33, their “true motion.”
(In the third edition, following proposition 33, Newton
inserted two propositions and a scholium on the
motion of the nodes, written by John Machin.)
Propositions 34 and 35, on the inclination of the orbit
of the moon to the ecliptic plane, are followed by a
scholium, considerably expanded and rewritten for
the second edition, in which Newton discussed yet
other “inequalities” in the motion of the moon and
developed the practical aspects of computing the
elements of that body's motion and position.
Propositions 36 and 37 deal at length and in a
quantitative fashion with the tide-producing forces
of the sun and of the moon, yielding, in proposition 38,
an explanation of the spheroidal shape of the moon
and the reason that (librations apart) the same face
of it is always visible. A series of three lemmas
introduces the subject of precession and a fourth
lemma (transformed into hypothesis 2 in the second
and third editions) treats the precession of a ring.
Proposition 39 represents an outstanding example
of the high level of mathematical natural science that
Newton reached in the Principia. In it he showed the
manner in which the shape of the earth, in relation
to the pull of the moon, acts on its axis of rotation so
as to produce the observed precession, a presentation
that he augmented and improved for the second
edition. Newton here employed the result he had
previously obtained (in propositions 20 and 21,
book III) concerning the shape of the earth, and
joined it to both the facts and theory of precession and
yet another aspect of the perturbing force of the moon
on the motion of the earth. He thus inaugurated a
major aspect of celestial mechanics, the study of a
three-body system.
Lemma 4, book III initiates a section on comets,
proving that comets are “higher” than the moon,
move through the solar system, and (corollary 1) shine
by reflecting sunlight; their motion shows (corollary 3)
that “the celestial spaces are void of resistance.”
Comets move in conic sections (proposition 40) having
the sun as a focus, according to the law of areas. Those
comets that return move in elliptic orbits (corollary 1)
and follow Kepler's third law, but (corollary 2) “their
orbits will be so near to parabolas, that parabolas
may be used for them without sensible error.”
Almost immediately following publication of the
Principia, Halley, in a letter of 5 July 1687, urged
Newton to go on with his work on lunar theory.166
Newton later remarked that his head so ached from
studying this problem that it often “kept him awake”
and “he would think of it no more.” But he also said
that if he lived long enough for Halley to complete
enough additional observations, he “would have
another stroke at the moon.” In the 1690's Newton
had depended on Flamsteed for observations of the
moon, promising Flamsteed (in a letter of
16 February 1695) not to communicate any of his
observations, “much less publish them, without your
consent.” But Newton and Flamsteed disagreed on
the value of theory, which Newton held to be useful
as “a demonstration” of the “exactness” of
observations,
while Flamsteed believed that “theories do
not command observations; but are to be tried by
them,” since “theories are . . . only probable” (even
“when they agree with exact and indubitable observations”).
At about this same time Newton was
drawing up a set of propositions on the motion of the
moon for a proposed new edition of the Principia,
for which he requested from Flamsteed such planetary
observations “as tend to [be useful for] perfecting the
theory of the planets,” to serve Newton in the
preparation of a second edition of his book.