Electronic edition published by Cultural Heritage Langauge Technologies (with permission from Charles Scribners and Sons) and funded by the National Science Foundation International Digital Libraries Program. This text has been proofread to a low degree of accuracy. It was converted to electronic form using data entry.
GASSENDI (GASSEND), PIERRE (b. Champtercier,
France, 22 January 1592; d. Paris, France, 24 October
1655), philosophy, astronomy, scholarship.
(1624) aimed against the Scholastics; he prudently
withheld a second volume. His reputation—and the
size of his correspondence—increased, and a canonry
at Digne assured his independence (he became provost
in 1634).
In Paris in 1624 and again in 1628, he met
Mersenne, Mydorge, the du Puy brothers, and Luillier.
In 1629-1630 he traveled with the latter in the
Low Countries, where he met Isaac Beeckman.
On 7 November 1631 he observed the transit of
Mercury, and in his Mercurius in sole visus (1632)
he treated the event as a confirmation of Kepler's
ideas. He returned to Digne at the end of 1632 and
undertook an extensive study of Epicurus' thought,
in the course of which he expressed his own. At some
junctures he clearly departed from the ancient philosopher,
but at others he placed statements inspired
by materialism next to affirmations of orthodoxy with
which they were difficult to reconcile. He was, however,
in no hurry to publish and seems even to have
interrupted his researches in 1637 when Peiresc died.
He resumed them again under the protection of the
new governor of Aix-en-Provence, Louis de Valois,
at whose behest he returned to Paris after election
to the Assembly of the Clergy, a position he was
obliged to renounce in 1641. At the request of
Mersenne, he immediately thereafter composed the
Cinquièmes objections to the Meditations of Descartes.
The Instantiae was published in 1644.
Gassendi's growing influence led Louis de Valois and
Cardinal Alphonse de Richelieu, archbishop of Lyons,
to appoint him professor of mathematics (i.e., astronomy)
at the Collège Royal in Paris in 1645. He published
a Leçon inaugurale and a Cours, in which he set
forth the system of Copernicus, while prudently falling
back on that of Tycho. He taught for only a short time,
however. His health was uncertain, and in 1648 Louis
de Valois called him back to Provence, where he spent
several years. His Animadversiones of 1649 contains a
portion of his works on Epicurus together with the
Greek text and translation of book 10 of Diogenes
Laertius.
In Paris once again in 1653, Gassendi produced
a third version of his great work entitled Syntagma
philosophicum, but he did not resume teaching. He
died at the home of his host, Habert de Montmort,
and was buried at St. Nicolas des Champs on 26
October 1655.
Gassendi's Opera omnia was published in six volumes
by his friends in Lyons (1658), according to a
plan he had established himself. The first two volumes
contain the Syntagma; the third, a series of scientific
works; the fourth, the astronomical lectures and observations;
the fifth, the Lives of Astronomers and
Epicurean works, as well as the Life of Peiresc; and
the sixth, the Latin correspondence he had selected
to preserve. The Animadversiones was not reprinted
in its original form until 1675.
Although he excited the curiosity and attention of
others, Gassendi did not seek to do so. He was not the
leader of the “libertines” and the future
“philosophes.”
Olivier Bloch, in his authoritative thesis, sees in
Gassendi a belated humanist rather than an avantgarde
thinker.1 There is no reason to question the
sincerity of his testimonies of allegiance to a church
of which he was a respected dignitary, as were his
best friends, Peiresc and Mersenne. His true intellectual
master was Galileo. In the Exercitationes of 1624
Gassendi had demonstrated his philosophic independence,
and as early as 12 July 1625 he wrote to
Galileo that he shared his Copernican ideas. But he
never had to suffer the anxieties of the great Florentine.
His choice of Epicurean atomism as a framework
for the exposition of his ideas appears to have been
more a revolt against Scholasticism than the expression
of any profound conviction. Moreover, his erudition
embraced all doctrines, including those of the
church fathers, whereas he rejected such important
elements of Epicureanism as the vertical fall and
swerving of atoms.
Gassendi's eclecticism was that of a skeptic assured
that no one doctrine penetrates to the essence of
things—indeed, this is a constant aspect of his
thought. Yet he proceeded as would a historian for
whom the human mind had exhausted all possibilities,
in contrast to Descartes, who wrote as if unaware
that anyone had ever done philosophy before
him. Gassendi's first published letter (to Pibrac, 8
April 1621) reveals an extreme diversity in what he
chose to adopt and a great deal of personal assurance;
he rejected only dogmatism, even when Epicurean.
Bound by no fixed viewpoint, he could more easily
go along with the traditions of his peasant milieu.
If his morality preached happiness, his method for
attaining it was conformist. A worldly type like
Saint-Évremond thought him timid. A fanatic like
J.-B. Morin consigned him to the flames. Descartes
accused him of nothing less than materialism—thereby
contributing more than slightly to the suspicion
in which he was held. Gassendi, in turn,
treated Descartes as a dogmatist. Moreover, he disappointed
the materialists. Gassendi wished, Karl
Marx declared, to put a nun's habit on the body of
Lais.2 In reality, Gassendi, believing Aristotle's metaphysics
to be pagan, attempted to establish a metaphysics
that would be Christian, but in harmony with
the fundamentally anti-Aristotelian contemporary
science.