Electronic edition published by Cultural Heritage Langauge Technologies (with permission from Charles Scribners and Sons) and funded by the National Science Foundation International Digital Libraries Program. This text has been proofread to a low degree of accuracy. It was converted to electronic form using data entry.
JORDANUS DE NEMORE (fl. ca. 1220), mechanics,
mathematics.
FIGURE 5
Guido Ubaldo's attitude was costly, for it led him to
reject Jordanus' correct inclined-plane theorem in
favor of an erroneous explanation by Pappus.
Since few editions of his mathematical treatises
have been published, and critical studies and evaluations
are largely lacking, Jordanus' place in the
history of medieval and early modern mathematics
has yet to be determined. Treatises on geometry,
algebra, proportions, and theoretical and practical
arithmetic have been attributed to him.
The Liber Philotegni de triangulis, a geometrical
work extant in two versions, represents medieval
Latin geometry at its highest level. In the four books
of the treatise we find propositions concerned with the
ratios of sides and angles; with the division of straight
lines, triangles, and quadrangles under a variety of
given conditions; and with ratios of arcs and plane
segments in the same circle and in different circles.
The fourth book contains the most significant and
sophisticated propositions. In IV.20 Jordanus presents
three solutions for the problem of trisecting an angle,
and IV.22 offers two solutions for finding two mean
proportionals between two given lines. A proof of
Hero's theorem on the area of a triangle--A =
?s(s - a)(s - b)(s -
c), where s is the semiperimeter
and a, b, and c are the sides of the triangle--may
also have been associated with the De triangulis.
Jordanus drew his solutions largely from Latin
translations of Arabic works, which were themselves
based on Greek mathematical texts. He did not always
approve of these proofs and occasionally displayed
a critical spirit, as when he deemed two proofs of the
trisection of an angle based on mechanical means
inadequate and uncertain (although no source is
mentioned, they were derived from the Verba filiorum
of the Banū Mūsā) and offered what is apparently his
own demonstration,18 in which a proposition from
Ibn al-Haytham's Optics is utilized. In IV.16 a non-Archimedean
proof of the quadrature of the circle
may have been original. It involves finding a third
continuous proportional. Here is the proof.19
To Form a Square Equal to a Given Circle.
For example, let the circle be A [see Figure 5].
Disposition: Let another circle B with its diameter be
added; let a square be described about each of those
circles. And the circumscribed square [in each case]
will be as a square of the diameter of the circle. Hence,
by [Proposition] XII.2 [of the Elements], circle A/circle
B = square DE/square FG. Therefore, by permutation,
DE/A = FG/B. Let there be formed a third surface C,
which is a [third] proportional [term] following DE and
A. Now C will either be a circle or a surface of another
kind, like a rectilinear surface. In the first place, let it
be a circle which is circumscribed by square HK. And
so, DE/A = A/C but also, by [Proposition] XII.2 [of
the Elements], DE/A = HK/C. Therefore, HK as
well as
A is a mean proportional between DE and C. Therefore,
circle A and square HK are equal, which we proposed.
Next, let C be some [rectilinear] figure other than a
circle. Then let it be converted into a square by the last
[proposition] of [Book] II [of the Elements], with its
angles designated as R, S, Y, and X. And so,
since DE is
the larger extreme [among the three proportional terms],
DE is greater than square RY, and a side [of DE] is
greater than a side [of RY]. Therefore, let MT, equal to
RX, be cut from MD. Then a parallelogram MN--contained
by ME and MT--is described. Therefore, MN
is the mean proportional between DE and RY, which
are the squares of its sides, since a rectangle is the mean
proportional between the squares of its sides. But
circle A was the mean proportional between them [i.e.,
between square DE and C (or square RY)]. Therefore,
circle A and parallelogram MN are equal. Therefore,
let MN be converted to a square by the last [proposition]
of [Book] II [of the Elements], and this square
will be equal to the given circle A, which we proposed.
The De numeris datis, Jordanus' algebraic treatise
in four books, which was praised by Regiomontanus,
was more formal and Euclidean than the algebraic
treatises derived from Arabic sources. Indeed it has
recently been claimed20 that in the De numeris datis
Jordanus anticipated Viète in the application of
analysis to algebraic problems. This may be seen in
Jordanus' procedure, where he regularly formulated
problems in terms of what is known and what is to be
found (this is tantamount to the construction of an
equation), and subsequently transforms the initial
equation into a final form from which a specific
computation is made with determinate numbers that
meet the general conditions of the problem.