Electronic edition published by Cultural Heritage Langauge Technologies (with permission from Charles Scribners and Sons) and funded by the National Science Foundation International Digital Libraries Program. This text has been proofread to a low degree of accuracy. It was converted to electronic form using data entry.
NEWTON, ISAAC (b. Woolsthorpe, England,
25 December 1642; d. London, England, 20 March
1727), mathematics, dynamics, celestial mechanics,
astronomy, optics, natural philosophy.
Revision of the “Opticks” (the Later Queries);
Chemistry and Theory of Matter.
Space, one of which acts upon the other, and by
consequence is re-acted upon, without retarding,
shattering, dispersing and compounding one another's
Motions.”
In query 30, Newton discussed the convertibility
of gross bodies and light, with examples showing that
nature delights in transmutations. In illustration, he
cited Boyle's assertion that frequent distillations had
turned water into earth. In query 31, he discussed
questions ranging from the forces that hold particles
of matter together to the impact of bodies on one
another; also causes of motion, fermentation, the
circulation of the blood and animal heat, putrefaction,
the force of inertia, and occult qualities. He stated a
general philosophy and concluded with the pious
hope that the perfection of natural philosophy will
enlarge the “Bounds of Moral Philosophy.”
Newton's queries, particularly the later ones, thus
go far beyond any simple questions of physical
or geometrical optics. In them he even proposed
tentative explanations of phenomena, although
explanations that are perhaps not as fully worked out,
or as fully supported by experimental evidence, as he
might have wished. (Some queries even propose what
is, by Newton's own definition, a hypothesis.) In each
case, Newton's own position is made clear; and
especially in the queries added in the Latin version of
1706 (and presented again in the English version of
1717/1718), his supporting evidence is apt to be a
short essay.
One notable development of the later queries is the
emphasis on an “Aethereal Medium” as an explanation
for phenomena. In his first papers on optics,
in the 1670's, Newton had combined his cherished
conception of corpuscular or globular light with the
possibly Cartesian notion of a space-filling ether,
elastic and varying in density. Although Newton had
introduced this ether to permit wave phenomena to
exist as concomitants of the rays of light, he also
suggested other possible functions for it—including
causing sensation and animal motion, transmitting
radiant heat, and even causing gravitation. His
speculations on the ether were incorporated in the
“Hypothesis” that he sent to the Royal Society
(read at their meetings in 1675 and 1676) and in a letter
to Boyle of 28 February 1679.168
In the second English edition of the Opticks
(1717/1718) Newton made additions which “embodied
arguments for the existence of an elastic, tenuous,
aetherial medium.” The new queries in the Latin
version of 1706 did not deal with an ether, however,
and by the time of the Principia, Newton may have
“rejected the Cartesian dense aether” as well as “his
own youthful aetherial speculations.”169
Newton thus did not propose a new version of the
ether until possibly the 1710's; he then suggested,
in the general scholium at the conclusion of the
second edition of the Principia (1713), that a most
subtle “spiritus” (“which pervades and lies hid in all
gross bodies”) might produce just such effects as his
earlier ether (or the later ethereal medium of queries 18
through 24). In the general scholium of the Principia,
however, Newton omitted gravitation from the list of
effects that the “spiritus” may produce. There is
evidence that Newton conceived of this “spiritus” as
electrical, and may well have been a precursor of the
ether or ethereal medium of the 1717/1718 queries.170
In a manuscript intended for the revised second
English edition of the Opticks,171 Newton wrote
the heading, “The Third Book of Opticks. Part II.
Observations concerning the Medium through which
Light passes, & the Agent which emits it,” a title
that would thus seem to link the ethereal medium with
the emission of electrical effluvia. It would further
appear that Newton used both the earlier and later
concepts of the ether to explain, however hypothetically,
results he had already obtained; and that the
concept of the ether was never the basis for significant
new experiments or theoretical results. In a general
scholium to book II, Newton described from memory
an experiment that he had performed which seemed
to him to prove the nonexistence of an ether; since
Newton's original notes have never been found, this
experiment, which was presumably an important
element in the decline of his belief in an ether, cannot
be dated.
The later queries also develop a concept of matter,
further expounded by Newton in his often reprinted
De natura acidorum (of which there appear to have
been several versions in circulation).172 Newton here,
as a true disciple of Boyle, began with the traditional
“mechanical philosophy” but added “the assumption
that particles move mainly under the influence of what
he at first called sociability and later called
attraction.”173 Although Newton also considered
a principle of repulsion, especially in gases, in
discussing chemical reactions he seems to have
preferred to use a concept of “sociability” (as, for
example, to explain how substances dissolve).
He was equally concerned with the “aggregation”
of particles (in queries 28 and 31 as well as at the end
of De natura acidorum) and even suggested a
means of “differentiating between reaction and
transmutation.”174 Another major concern was the
way in which aqua regia dissolves gold but not silver,
while aqua fortis dissolves silver but not gold,175
a phenomenon Newton explained by a combination
of the attraction of particles and the relation between