Electronic edition published by Cultural Heritage Langauge Technologies (with permission from Charles Scribners and Sons) and funded by the National Science Foundation International Digital Libraries Program. This text has been proofread to a low degree of accuracy. It was converted to electronic form using data entry.
LAMARCK, JEAN BAPTISTE PIERRE ANTOINE
DE MONET DE (b. Bazentin-le-Petit, Picardy,
France, 1 August 1744; d. Paris, France, 28 December
1829), botany, invertebrate zoology and paleontology,
evolution.
Theory of Evolution.
Gradually new organs or parts would be formed as
acquired modifications were passed on through
reproduction.
The great expansion of Lamarck's ideas occurred
between 1800 and 1802, when the Recherches sur
l'organisation des corps vivans was published. Much
of the work was devoted to documenting the “degradations”
in organization of the larger groupings of
animals, from mammals to polyps. He was, however,
more aware of the need to turn this series over so that
it would correspond to the order of production in
nature and time and thus be a really natural method
of classification. Once he began to think in terms of
increasing levels of complexity, he needed a mechanism
to propel change; otherwise one would have only
polyps in the world. He therefore began to talk of a
natural tendency in the organic realms toward increasing
complexity. Lamarck is not clear or consistent
about the manner in which this natural tendency
operates; often it seems to function like a moving
escalator. At other times it can best be understood by
a stairlike construction where descent is more directly
tied to the historical past although Lamarck never
suggests any dates marking the appearance of particular
forms of life.
Lamarck's conception of a natural tendency toward
increasing complexity provided a perfect complement
to his views of the mineral kingdom with the opposite
natural tendency. In both cases a long time span
allowed nature to do her work and local circumstances
explained irregularities. Among living beings, irregularities
included all organisms below the level of the
“masses,” which usually meant classes but sometimes
was extended to orders and families, never to genera
and species.
In 1802 many of the additions were designed to
explain in more detail why and how evolution happened;
Lamarck's chemistry was essential to those
explanations. He had to face the crucial problem of
what happened at the lower ends of the vegetable
and animal series. Rejecting the vitalist views of such
contemporaries as Bichat, Lamarck defined life in
physical terms. Life resulted from a particular kind
of organization and a general tension maintained
by the stimulation of the subtle fluids of his chemistry,
especially modified forms of fire.
Spontaneous generation of animals, which Lamarck
held was analogous to fertilization, occurred when
heat (or caloric), sunlight, and electricity acted on
small amounts of unorganized, moist, gelatinous
matter to produce the simplest animals. He later
specified that the simplest plants were spontaneously
generated when the same physical substances organized
moist, mucilaginous matter. The first traces of
organic organization formed by the subtle fluids were
simple structures capable of containing certain fluids,
such as water, and more complex substances. From
this point on, the natural tendency of organic movement
toward increasing complexity could take over.
In plants and simple animals, the physical cause of this
tendency was the constant agitation of the contained
fluids by the subtle fluids of the environment (especially
the matter of heat), which were not containable
and could penetrate the living organism. The result of
this agitation was the gradual hollowing out of
passages and tubes and the eventual formation of
organs and then primitive systems.
Animals with circulatory systems were less directly
dependent on the environment because, Lamarck
believed, the matter of heat was constantly disengaging
from the blood and thus providing an internal stimulus
for greater development. Such was the materialistic
explanation he gave for the origin of the larger
groupings of plants and animals. All differences below
that level were explained by variations in the movement
of the containable and subtle fluids due to
different circumstances, especially the temperature of
the environment, and to changing life styles resulting
in new habits. Through the use of parts, containable
fluids were concentrated and the formation of new
organs was accelerated. With new organs and systems,
new faculties appeared. Acquired changes were
preserved through inheritance.
In 1802 Lamarck dealt briefly with the upper limit
of the animal series—man. He cautiously suggested
that man was the result of the same processes that had
produced all other living organisms. The major
obstacle to the inclusion of man in the evolutionary
process was his higher mental faculties. At the end of
the Recherches, Lamarck offered a possible solution to
this problem. Using his chemistry and comparative
anatomy, he attempted to provide a materialistic
explanation for the functioning of the nervous system.
Following Haller's distinction, he maintained that
while all animals exhibit irritability, only those with a
nervous system experience sensibility or feeling. The
degree to which an animal possessed the latter
faculties depended on the level of complexity of the
nervous system and the movement of the nervous
fluid, which was a modified form of fire, similar to
electricity. This subject of the evolution of the higher
mental faculties underwent major development in
the Philosophie zoologique (1809).
This work is the best-known and most extensive
presentation of Lamarck's theory of evolution. An
expanded version of the 1802 Recherches, it is divided
into three sections. The first is a more elaborate
analysis of the evidence for increasing levels of