Electronic edition published by Cultural Heritage Langauge Technologies (with permission from Charles Scribners and Sons) and funded by the National Science Foundation International Digital Libraries Program. This text has been proofread to a low degree of accuracy. It was converted to electronic form using data entry.
HOBBES, THOMAS (b. Malmesbury, England, 5
April 1588; d. Hardwick, Derbyshire, England, 4 December
1679), political philosophy, moral philosophy,
geometry, optics.
He stayed in London for a year and then retired
to Chatsworth, where the Cavendish family treated
him with affection and even a certain deference, as
befitted a philosopher of international renown. But
the shock inflicted by Leviathan on clerical and lay
opinion produced a rising tide of hostile criticism,
some of it intelligent and philosophical but much of
it in the form of abuse.12 Hobbes was pronounced
atheist, heretic, and libertine. He was the “Monster
of Malmesbury,” “a pander to bestiality” whose
“doctrines have had so great a share of the debauchery
of his Generation, that a good Christian can
hardly hear his name without saying of his
prayers.”13 It is true that Hobbes had his admirers
and defenders, both on the Continent and in England,
including such perceptive opponents as Samuel
von Pufendorf and James Harrington, who understood
that De cive and Leviathan were works to be
reckoned with; but the clergy of all persuasions, as
well as the common lawyers and university dons,
united in their opposition to Hobbes. Indeed, his
doctrines were cited by the House of Commons as
a probable cause of the Great Fire of 1666.
Part of Hobbes's difficulties can be traced to a controversy
between himself and John Bramhall, bishop
of Derry (Londonderry) and later archbishop of
Armagh. The two had met in 1645 at Paris, where
they debated the subject of free will. Bramhall committed
his ideas to paper; Hobbes wrote a rejoinder.
Both agreed not to publish what they had written,
but Hobbes's side of the question was put into print
without his permission in a little treatise called Of
Liberty and Necessity (1654). Bramhall, outraged by
what he considered to be Hobbes's discourtesy in
ignoring his side, published in 1655 all that had
passed between them. Thus was launched a controversy
which continued until Hobbes had the last word
with the posthumous publication of An Answer to a
Book by Dr Bramhall Called The Catching of the
Leviathan (1682). Hobbes's views were strictly determinist.
A man, he said, is “free” to do anything he
desires if there are no obstacles in his way; but his
desire to do anything has necessary and material
causes. To Bramhall this doctrine was the essence of
impiety; it would deny any meaning to rewards for
good actions or punishments for evil ones, thus overturning
the whole apparatus of religious worship. For
his part Hobbes admitted that piety might not be
promoted by his doctrine, but “truth is truth” and
he would not be silent.
Hobbes was not molested personally during this
last period of his life because he enjoyed the protection
of Charles II, although he was deeply alarmed
when, sometime in the 1660's, a committee of bishops
in the House of Lords moved that he be burned for
heresy. He wrote, but did not publish, a short treatise
in the form of a legal brief showing that the law of
heresy had been repealed in the time of Elizabeth
and had never been revived, so that there could be
no legal grounds for executing him.14 Nothing came
of the episcopal agitation; but the king refused to
license a history in English by Hobbes of the Long
Parliament, published posthumously as Behemoth,
and the crown prohibited Hobbes from publishing
any other works in English on the subject of politics
or religion. Not included in this ban was the Latin
translation of Leviathan, made by Henry Stubbe and
first published at Amsterdam in 1668 and at London
in 1678.
A second controversy, even more absorbing of
Hobbes's energy than his debate with Bramhall, was
his dispute with John Wallis on questions of geometry.
Wallis was a vastly superior mathematician who
made important contributions to the development of
the calculus. But he was an acrimonious, coarse-tempered
man; in a controversy that lasted almost
twenty-five years, Wallis pressed his mathematical
advantage with ferocious zeal, also attacking Hobbes
for what he thought were errors in Greek, for having
a West Country manner of speech, for being a rustic,
for disloyalty to the crown, and so on. Hobbes's replies
were better mannered, but he too was capable
of losing his temper. The issue between the two men
was whether Hobbes had succeeded, as he claimed,
both in squaring the circle and in duplicating the
cube. Hobbes boldly announced success in both enterprises,
although he modified his claim slightly in
some of the later books written against Wallis. It
should be observed that neither Hobbes nor Wallis
doubted the possibility of a quadrature, a proof of
its impossibility not having been discovered until the
nineteenth century; moreover, the problem of the
quadrature was not only venerable but had a particular
vitality in the seventeenth century. Nevertheless,
Wallis was able to show that Hobbes's claim of success
was unfounded. Hobbes made no original contributions
to geometry but, as A. De Morgan has
written, though Hobbes was “very wrong in his quadrature
... he was not the ignoramus in geometry that
he is sometimes supposed. His writings, erroneous as
they are in many things, contain acute remarks on
points of principle.”15 Hobbes's passion for geometry
derived from his analytic conception of truth.
He appreciated the unity and logical structure of
geometry, its freedom from verbal confusion, and
its reasoning from definitions placed in their proper
order.