Electronic edition published by Cultural Heritage Langauge Technologies (with permission from Charles Scribners and Sons) and funded by the National Science Foundation International Digital Libraries Program. This text has been proofread to a low degree of accuracy. It was converted to electronic form using data entry.
STENSEN, NIELS, also known as Nicolaus Steno
(b. Copenhagen, Denmark, 1%6111 January 1638; d.
Schwerin, Germany, 25 November/5 December
1686), anatomy, geology, mineralogy.
of the muscle fluid. Later, Stensen (before the
theory of irritability proclaimed by Haller) discovered
that a muscle contraction can also result
from direct stimulation of the muscle.
Stensen's muscle research was also a symptom
of his philosophical-religious struggle. At the turn
of 1662%611663 he had wanted to abandon anatomy
for mathematics and physics, a wish probably fostered
by the spirit of the times and by his desire for
certainty. The need for quantitative knowledge was
indicated by Stensen's early enthusiasm for Descartes's
method of attaining certainty. During his
years in Leiden, Stensen became friendly with
Spinoza, whose rationalism may have influenced
Stensen so strongly that his Christian belief was
endangered. His discovery of the muscle structure
of the heart showed him the fallacy of the Cartesian
view of the heart as a hearth of fire and made
him skeptical of their whole seemingly firmly anchored
geometrical philosophy. As he admitted latter
to Leibniz: “If these gentlemen have been so
mistaken with material things which are accessible
to the senses, what warranty can they offer that
they are not mistaken when they talk about God
and the soul?”
The third period of research extended from 1665
to 1667, the last great anatomical-physiological
period of his life. The period can be divided into
three parts: brain anatomy, embryology, and comparative
anatomy.
Stensen's study of brain anatomy was confined
almost entirely to his Discours . . . sur l'anatomie
du cerveau (1669), which he presented in Paris to
Thévenot's circle, among whom were many Cartesians.
Stensen was stimulated to undertake his
brain studies not only by his teacher, the brain
anatomist Sylvius, but also by Descartes's Traité
de l'homme. Vigorously but tactfully, Stensen opposed
Descartes's mechanical theory and revealed
his anatomical errors, refuting especially his theory
concerning the epiphysis. According to Stensen,
the epiphysis could not possibly carry out the
slightest motion and thereby contribute to one's
actions; whereas the Cartesian view was that it
inclined itself to one side and then to the other
side. In the Discours Stensen calls for a sober terminology
and proposes new methods of dissection
and the preparation of specimens. Stensen demands
that the investigation trace the course of the
brain fibers and that the investigator strive for a
secure knowledge of the anatomical parts before
interpreting their functions. In recent times his
drawings of the brain have shown that he had a
very rich knowledge of its anatomy.
From 1667 to 1669 Stensen contributed two
concepts about the ovum and the ovary, oviduct,
and uterus. The ovaries were considered to be
testes muliebres, a type of semen producer. In a
recently hatched chick Stensen discovered the
oviduct and recognized that it was a canal destined
to conduct the yolk directly into the intestine. In
the Elementorum Stensen says that since he had
found the true ova in the female testes, he concluded
that they were really ovaries. Johannes Peter
Müller credited Stensen with a discovery made by
Aristotle but then forgotten: that in the so-called
smooth sharks (Mustelus laevis) the eggs are not
deposited, but the embryos remain connected to the
uterus by a placenta, similar to that of mammals.
Stensen's embryological observations were not
published until 1675, but he had communicated
them to De Graaf and Swammerdam. Therefore,
the Royal Society of London, in the priority dispute
concerning the procreative organs, assigned
the credit to Stensen.
Among Stensen's unpublished observations are
those on rays and sharks. He established the mucous
canal system of these fishes and recognized
the significance of the spiral fold in the intestine as
a substitute for its greater length in other creatures.
He also observed the eyeball stalk, the optical
nerve, and the crossing of the optic nerves.
The technical side of Stensen's research was
highly developed. He employed simple but effective
means, such as the induction of bristles into
the gland ducts or the expansion of vessels by inflation.
It is not known to what extent he used the
microscope, but he knew the optical experts of his
time and such microscopists as Swammerdam and
Malpighi. He was also a skilled draftsman. His
diagram of the blood circulation, which for the first
time revealed the heart as two relatively independent
hearts or pumps, enabled his pupil Caspar
Bartholin, Jr., to develop further the concept of circulation.
The fourth and greatest period of Stensen's research
began in Florence at the end of October
1666, when he received the head of a gigantic Carcharodon
rondeletii that had been caught near
Leghorn. He made acute observations of its skin,
its canals, the brain and nerves, the Lorenzinian
ampullae, and the eyes. The rows of pointed teeth
in the mouth, however, led him to a thorough study
of their number and substance and also placed
immediately before him the question of the relation
of these teeth to the so-called glossopetra or
tongue-stones, which were common on Malta and
were considered lapides sui generis. Stensen concluded