Electronic edition published by Cultural Heritage Langauge Technologies (with permission from Charles Scribners and Sons) and funded by the National Science Foundation International Digital Libraries Program. This text has been proofread to a low degree of accuracy. It was converted to electronic form using data entry.
LAMARCK, JEAN BAPTISTE PIERRE ANTOINE
DE MONET DE (b. Bazentin-le-Petit, Picardy,
France, 1 August 1744; d. Paris, France, 28 December
1829), botany, invertebrate zoology and paleontology,
evolution.
Botany.
scientific community resulted from the publication of
his Flore françoise in 1779 (not 1778 as the title page
says). His innovation was the establishment of
dichotomous keys to aid in the identification of French
plants; by eliminating large groups of plants at each
stage through the use of mutually exclusive characteristics,
the given name of any plant could be rapidly
determined. This “method of analysis,” as Lamarck
called it, was much easier to use in identifying plants
than Linnaeus' artificial system of classification, which
was based on sexual differences among plants or the
natural methods of classification then developing in
France with the work of Adanson, Bernard de Jussieu,
and Antoine Laurent de Jussieu. Lamarck's new
approach and his criticisms of Linnaeus impressed
Buffon, who arranged to have the Flore published by
the government. The first of the three volumes
contained a theoretical “Discours préliminaire” which,
among other things, explained the method of analysis
and a lengthy exposition of the fundamentals of
botany. The other two volumes listed all known
French plants according to his method of classification
and provided good descriptions of each species. The
Flore was one of the first French works to include the
Linnaean nomenclature as well as that of Tournefort.
Written in French rather than Latin, the Flore was an
immediate success and the first printing was sold out
within the year; in 1780 the work was reprinted.
Lamarck had various plans for a new edition but was
unable to carry them out for lack of funds. Finally,
in 1795, the Flore was reprinted; although it did not
differ from the first edition, it was called a second
edition. In 1802 Lamarck, who was too busy doing
other things, turned the preparation of a new edition
over to A. P. de Candolle, who published what is
called the third edition in 1805. Candolle made
major revisions, replacing Lamarck's system of
classification with that of A. L. de Jussieu and revising
the section on the fundamentals of botany to include
new scientific discoveries. Ten years later this third
edition was reprinted and another volume was added
to include species previously unknown or overlooked.
Lamarck's other major work in botany was his
contribution to the Dictionnaire de botanique, which
formed part of the larger Encyclopédie méthodique.
He wrote the first three and a half of eight volumes;
they were published in 1783, 1786, 1789, and 1795.
Lamarck composed a long “Discours préliminaire,”
articles on all aspects of botany including classification
and the structures of plants, and articles describing
specific plants and their classificatory groupings. The
companion piece to the Dictionnaire, the Illustration
des genres, appeared in three volumes in 1791, 1798,
and 1800. It included about 900 plates, descriptions
of genera arranged according to Linnaeus' system of
classification, and a listing of all known species in
these genera. Lamarck himself had identified several
new genera and species; he published these discoveries
as articles in various publications from 1784 to 1792.
In addition to devising a new and useful method for
the identification of plants and doing systematic
botany, Lamarck demonstrated a number of theoretical
and philosophical interests in his botanical
works. In the “Discours préliminaire” of the
Flore,
Lamarck made his first attempt to formulate a natural
method of classification for the vegetable kingdom.
His aim was to discover the position every vegetable
species should occupy in a graduated unilinear chain
of being on the basis of comparative structural
relationships. Unable to achieve this, he had to settle
for a natural order at the level of the genera and even
this was very tentative. Although he shared a common
assumption of the time, that a natural classification
would begin with the most complex and descend to
the simplest organism, he found that in practice it was
easier to work in the opposite order. This order would
later be an essential feature of his evolutionary theory.
Lamarck intended to develop his natural method in
a work which was to be entitled Théâtre universel de
botanique. The proposed work was to include all
members of the vegetable kingdom, not just those
found in France; it was never written.
In the “Discours préliminaire” of the Flore,
Lamarck showed the orientation of a naturalist
philosopher concerned more with the broad problems
than the little facts, as he called them. He conceived
of nature as a whole composed of living and nonliving
things, the former divided into plants and animals.
It was the view of the whole, its processes, and
interrelations which really interested him.
Lamarck, in the same work, demonstrated his
awareness of the important influence of the environment,
especially climate, on vegetable development.
He noted that two seeds from the same plant growing
in two very different environments would become two
apparently different species. Lamarck was particularly
conscious of the changes plants undergo in artificial
cultivation and he referred to such changes as degradations,
the term he first used in describing evolutionary
processes in 1800. In 1779, however, Lamarck
still believed in fixed species and thought of the
environment as the factor responsible for the production
of varieties; by 1800 he had extended these
views on the production of varieties to the origin of
all organisms below the level of classes.
In 1779 Lamarck also demonstrated his genetic
approach to a subject; the present is understood by
tracing the historical steps that produced it, beginning