The Sacred Theory of the Earth (1684)


The Sacred Theory of the Earth (1684)




Linda Hall Library Collection Table of Contents



TO THE KINGS MOST Excellent Majesty.

PREFACE TO THE READER.

THE THEORY OF THE EARTH. BOOK I
  CHAP. I.
  CHAP. II.
  CHAP. III.
  CHAP. IV.
  CHAP. V.
  CHAP. VI.
  CHAP. VII.
  CHAP. VIII.
  CHAP. IX.
  CHAP. X.
  CHAP. XI.
  CHAP. XII.

THE THEORY OF THE EARTH. BOOK II
  CHAP. I.
  CHAP. II.
  CHAP. III.
  CHAP. IV.
  CHAP. V.
  CHAP. VI.
  CHAP. VII.
  CHAP. VIII.
  CHAP. IX.
  CHAP. X.
  CHAP. XI.


Electronic edition published by Cultural Heritage Langauge Technologies and funded by the National Science Foundation International Digital Library Program. This text has been proofread to a low degree of accuracy. It was converted to electronic form using Data Entry.

THE THEORY OF THE EARTH. BOOK II

CHAP. X.

    ings and Corporeal; but seeing 'tis only the Matenal World that hath been the subject of our Discourse, Nature, as to that, may be defin'd, The Powers of Matter, with the Laws establisht for their action and conduct. Seeing also Matter hath no action, whether from it self, or imprest upon it, but Motion, as to the Corporeal World Nature is no more than The powers and capacities of Matter, with the Laws that govern the Motions of it. And this definition is so plain and easie, that, I believe, all parties will agree in it; There will also be no great controversie what these Laws are, As that one part of Matter cannot penetrate another, nor be in several places at once; That the greater Body overcomes the less, and the swifter the slower; That all Motion is in a right line, till something obstruct it or divert it; which are points little disputed as to the matter of fact; but the points concerning which the controversie ariseth, and which are to lead us to the Author of Nature, are these, Who or what is the Author of these Laws? of this Motion? and even of Matter it self; and of all those modes and forms of it which we see in Nature?

The Question useth chiefly to be put concerning Motion, how it came into the World; what the first Source of it is, or how Matter came at first to be mov'd? For the simple notion of Matter, not divided into parts, nor diversified, doth not imply Motion, but Extension only; 'Tis true, from Extension there necessarily follows mobility, or a capacity of being mov'd by an External power, but not actual or necessary Motion springing from it self. For dimensions, or length, breadth, and depth, which is the Idea of Matter, or of a Body, do no way include local Motion, or translation of parts; on the contrary, we do more easily and naturally conceive simple Extension as a thing steddy and fixt, and if we conceive Motion in it, or in its parts, we must superadd something to our first thought, and something that does not flow from Extension. As when we conceive a Figure, a Triangle, Square, or any other, we naturally conceive it fixt or quiescent, and if afterwards we ima

 Image Size: 240x320 480x640 
960x1280 1440x1920 1920x2560